Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Vol. 50, 26 April 2024
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
In the era of contract-based maritime rescue under the background of amendments to the Maritime Code, disputes arise regarding whether a rescuer who, due to negligence, causes harm to the assisted party should bear tort liability. When a rescuer negligently causes harm to the assisted party during maritime rescue operations, it constitutes concurrent liability for tort and breach of contract. The rescuer should bear the responsibility for compensating the damages. Specifically, in establishing liability, it is essential to adhere to the standards identical to those in the Tort Liability section of the Civil Code. However, in determining the scope of liability, the principle of full compensation should not be strictly applied and can be appropriately relaxed. First, after posing the question, this paper employs a legal normative analysis method to explore the applicable domestic and foreign laws as well as international treaties related to the issue. The current legal system’s stance on the matter is derived from legal norms. Analyzing the rights and obligations relationship between the rescuer and the assisted party from the perspective of balancing interests aims to achieve a new balance of interests between the two parties. Secondly, by comparing the Maritime Code with the Civil Code, the specific differences between the Maritime Code and the Civil Code provisions are identified. Additionally, considering the inherent characteristics of the Maritime Code, an analysis is conducted to differentiate the establishment and scope of liability for negligence-induced maritime rescue. Thirdly, through comparative analysis, it is determined that the rescuer should bear liability for damages resulting from negligent infringement, but the scope of liability can be appropriately limited. Moreover, a comparison between the maritime rescue system and relevant systems is made to clarify the relationship between the maritime rescue system and other relevant systems, providing theoretical support for the amendment of the Maritime Code. Finally, solutions and recommendations are proposed for the issues raised in the context of amendments to the Maritime Code.
Maritime Rescue, Tort Liability, Negligence, Maritime Liability Compensation Limitations
1. Xinde Maritime. (2023, December 26). “Shipping Industry: Ship Operations Will Become More ‘Expensive and Chaotic’.” WeChat Public Account.
2. Si, Y. Z. Maritime Law (4th ed.). Law Press China, 10.
3. Li, T., & Xu, J. (2016). “The Legal Essence of ‘No Effect, No Reward.’“ Journal of Dalian Maritime University (Social Sciences), 5, 2.
4. Si, Y. Z. A Monograph on Maritime Law (4th ed.). Renmin University of China Press, 316.
5. Tan, M. (2020). “Research on Compensation Liability for Damage Caused by Fault of Maritime Rescuers.” Master’s thesis, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, 21.
6. Larenz, K. (2016). Legal Methodology (J. Huang, Trans.). Commercial Press, 367.
7. Tan, M. (2020). “Research on Compensation Liability for Damage Caused by Fault of Maritime Rescuers.” Master’s thesis, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, 23.
8. Zhang, M. (2006). “The Impact of Rescuer’s Improper Behavior on Rescue Remuneration.” Master’s thesis, Shanghai Maritime University, 32.
9. Cao, X. G. (2020). Study on the Self-Contained Nature of Maritime Law (1st ed.). Law Press China, 34.
10. Cheng, X. Tort Liability Law (3rd ed.). Law Press China, 172.
11. Pan, W. L. (2017). “Constructing Unified Foreseeability Rules in Damage Compensation Law.” Jurist, 4, 31.
12. Wang, L. M., Yang, L. X., Wang, Y. S., & Cheng, X. (2020). Civil Law (6th ed.) (Vol. 2). Law Press China, 1054.
13. Zhang, P. T., & Zhuang, X. L. (2022). “Judicial Determination of Causation in Tort Liability for Compensation for Damages.” South China Law Review, 1, 51.
14. Larenz, K. (2003). Legal Methodology (A. E. Chen, Trans.). Commercial Press, 317.
15. Si, Y. Z., & Hu, Z. L. (2003). Draft Articles, Reference Legislative Examples, and Explanations of the Proposed Amendments to the Maritime Law of the People’s Republic of China. Dalian Maritime University Press, 453.
16. Zhang, X. B. Tort Liability Law (5th ed.). Renmin University of China Press, 6.
17. Gao, J. T. (2020). “Examination of the Fault Damage Compensation Liability of Maritime Rescuers.” Journal of Maritime Law, 9, 214.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).