Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media

- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences


Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media

Vol. 3, 01 March 2023


Open Access | Article

How does the disclosure of investigations affect the public's fear on the epidemic?

Shengbai Cui 1 , Keyi Gao * 2 , Yujing Li 3 , Chengwei Yang 4
1 School of Media, Harbin Normal University, Harbin, 150025, China
2 School of Music and Recording, Communication University of China, Beijing, 100024, China
3 School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Hubei, 430072, China
4 The College of Chinese Language and Literature, Hunan University, Changsha, 410006, China

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, Vol. 3, 16-25
Published 01 March 2023. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by EWA Publishing
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation Shengbai Cui, Keyi Gao, Yujing Li, Chengwei Yang. How does the disclosure of investigations affect the public's fear on the epidemic?. LNEP (2023) Vol. 3: 16-25. DOI: 10.54254/2753-7048/3/2022449.

Abstract

With the outbreak of COVID-19 and the adoption of the epidemiological investigation, the disclosure of epidemiological investigation has also aroused public fear and even caused online violence. Therefore, it is essential to explore the root causes of mass panic to reduce public fear fundamentally. Based on the extended parallel process model, this paper systematically studies the effectiveness of epidemiological investigation disclosure on the public fear of the epidemic and puts forward reasonable suggestions for maintaining public opinion health and reducing public opinion violence. This paper collected 126 questionnaires what investigated samples from four dimensions, Susceptibility, severity, self-efficacy, and response efficacy, to explore the relationship between these four variables and public fear. Through correlation analysis and regression analysis of questionnaire data, the higher the perceived threat and perceived efficacy are, the higher the public fear degree is, and the more willing people are to accept the prevention and control suggestions. In the evaluation process, Susceptibility and self-efficacy are positively associated with the level of public fear, while severity and response efficacy had no significant effect on it. The results showed that relevant science popularization should be strengthened, perceived threat and perceived efficacy should be improved, and the balance between the precision of the epidemiological investigation and public privacy should be maintained.

Keywords

public fear, epidemiological investigation, perceived threat, extended parallel process model, perceived efficacy.

References

1. Broche-Pérez, Y., Fernández-Fleites, Z., Jiménez-Puig, E., Fernández-Castillo, E., & Rodríguez-Martin, B. C. (2020). Gender and fear of COVID-19 in a Cuban population sample. International journal of mental health and addiction, 1-9.

2. Huang Rui (2020). Distributed data security thinking by the issue of personal privacy disclosure in the epidemiological investigation.

3. Asmundson, G. J., & Taylor, S. (2020). How health anxiety influences responses to viral outbreaks like COVID-19: What all decision-makers, health authorities, and health care professionals need to know. Journal of anxiety disorders, 71, 102211.

4. Mertens, G., Duijndam, S., Smeets, T., & Lodder, P. (2021). The latent and item structure of COVID-19 fear: A comparison of four COVID-19 fear questionnaires using SEM and network analyses. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 81, 102415.

5. Lang, P. J. (1968). Fear reduction and fear behavior: Problems in treating a construct. In Research in psychotherapy conference, 3rd, May-Jun, 1966, Chicago, IL, US. American Psychological Association.

6. Ahorsu, D. K., Lin, C. Y., Imani, V., Saffari, M., Griffiths, M. D., & Pakpour, A. H. (2020). The fear of COVID-19 scale: development and initial validation. International journal of mental health and addiction, 1-9.

7. Xie Qingfeng (2021). The impact of media use and sense of panic on social media curation of news during the epidemic. Journal of International Communication, 43(05):43-64.

8. MAO Yunjie; Sun Yunfeng; Liu Hanqiang; Liu Tao; Zhang Lei; Zhang Yuhai; Wang Zhizhong (2009).The psychological impact of the spread of influenza A (H1N1). J Fourth Mil Med Univ, (19), 2045-2047.

9. Wang Huan (2003).The causes of group panic and its elimination -- Interpreting group psychology from SARS epidemic event. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Social Sciences Edition), (03), 1-4.

10. Li Wenqian (2020).Research on panic emotion Propagation model based on epidemic theory. (Master thesis, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics).

11. Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communications Monographs, 59(4), 329-349.

12. Witte, K. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communication Monographs, 61, 113–134.

13. Chen, L., Shi, J., Guo, Y., Wang, P., & Li, Y. (2019). Agenda-setting on traditional vs social media: An analysis of haze-related content grounded in the extended parallel process model. Internet Research.

14. Leventhal, H. (1971). Fear appeals and persuasion: the differentiation of a motivational construct. American Journal of Public Health, 61(6), 1208-1224.

15. Maddux, J. E., & Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. Social Psychophysiology: A Source Book, 19, 469-573.

16. Zhang Ke; Du Xiufang; Tao Xiaorun; Zhang Yuanyuan;Kang Dianmin (2015).Review and prospect of the development of fear appeal in AIDS behavioral intervention. Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine, (08), 752-756.

17. Bekalu, MA and Eggermont, S. (2015). Aligning HIV/AIDS Communication With the Oral Tradition of Africans: A Theory-Based Content Analysis of Songs' Potential in Prevention Efforts. HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 30 (5), 441-450

18. Krumm, S; Porzsolt, F; Kilian, R (2016). The analysis of factors affecting municipal employees' willingness to report to work during an influenza pandemic using the extended parallel process model (EPPM). BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 16.

19. Fahr, A. (2018). Using efficacy cues in persuasive health communication is more effective than employing threats - An experimental study of a vaccination intervention against Ebola. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 23 (3), 665-684.

20. Guidry, JPD; Carlyle, KE; Perrin, PB; LaRose, JG; Ryan, M; Messner, M (2019). A path model of psychosocial constructs predicting future Zika vaccine uptake intent. VACCINE, 37 (36), 5233-5241.

21. Serpas, DG and Ignacio, DA (2021). COVID-19 fear mediates the relationship between perceived risk and preventive behaviors: the moderating role of perceived effectiveness. PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH.

22. Zarghami, F; Allahverdipour, H and Jafarabadi, MA (2021). Extended parallel process model (EPPM) in evaluating lung Cancer risk perception among older smokers. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries (ICEIPI 2022), Part II
ISBN (Print)
978-1-915371-09-6
ISBN (Online)
978-1-915371-10-2
Published Date
01 March 2023
Series
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
ISSN (Print)
2753-7048
ISSN (Online)
2753-7056
DOI
10.54254/2753-7048/3/2022449
Copyright
01 March 2023
Open Access
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Copyright © 2023 EWA Publishing. Unless Otherwise Stated