Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Vol. 8, 14 September 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This work studies how mating strategies vary between long-term and short-term relationships, and between males and females. Therefore, it leads to the discussion and comparison between monogamy and polygamy. In this work, males’ and females’ biological difference is analyzed to present different priorities in mating strategy. Additionally, the optimal evolutionary mating strategies for men and women are present according to their own circumstances and needs. From a macro point of view, sexual market is objectively existed, which make it crucial for people to know how to improve and make use of their sexual market values, such as choosing an appropriate mating strategy and marriage.
polygamy, monogamy, mating, evolution, psychology
1. G. A. Schuiling(2000) The benefit and the doubt: why monogamy?
2. https://psychology.fandom.com/wiki/Monogamy#:~:text=Monogamy%20from%20this%20perspective%20promotes%20sexism%20and%20leads,social%20progress%20and%20offers%20people%20more%20secure%20relationships.
3. https://familyinequality.wordpress.com/2011/11/18/chinese-divorce-modern-style/.
4. https://econofact.org/the-mystery-of-the-declining-u-s-birth-rate.
5. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sexually-transmitted-infections-(stis).
6. Steven W. Gangestad (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism.
7. Cronin, H. (1991) The ant and the peacock. Cambridge University Press.
8. Kelly, S., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2001). Who dares, wins: Heroism versus altruism in women’s mate choice. Human Nature.
9. Sadalla, E. K., Kenrick, D. T., & Vershure, B. (1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 730–738.
10. Scheib, J. E. (1999) Context-specific mate choice criteria: Trade-offs in the contexts of long-term and extra-pair mateships. (submitted).
11. M Kirkpatrick (1986) The handicap mechanism of sexual selection does not work. American Naturalist 127:222–40.
12. Bereczkei, T., Voros, S., Gal, A. & Bernath, L. (1997) Resources, attractiveness, family commitment: Reproductive decisions in human mate choice.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).