Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Vol. 15, 26 October 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics anxiety has long been a hotly debated topic of research in education and psychology, and studies have confirmed the prevalence of mathematics anxiety among learners of different ages and its impact on learners’ mathematics performance. This literature review attempted to organize the discuss two research points under the topic of mathematics anxiety. The first part focuses on analyzing the mediating factors between mathematics anxiety and outcomes in order to clarify the mediators of their effects and the process of mediation. The second part is related to the differences of mathematics anxiety in different age groups and describes the causes of mathematics anxiety in different groups to provide strategies for learners to improve their mathematics performance and directions for educators to improve their teaching. Based on these arguments, a foundation for subsequent research on math anxiety is provided. However, more empirical studies are needed to justify the findings and hypotheses.
mathematics anxiety, mathematics performance, control-value theory, students
1. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of Achievement Emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and Implications for Educational Research and Practice.Educational Psychology Review,18(4), 315–341.
2. Dane, A. (2005). Differences in mathematics anxiety by sex, program, and Education of University mathematics students in Turkey. Psychological Reports, 96(2), 422–424.
3. Ashcraft, M. H. and Kirk, E. P. (2001) ‘The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2), pp. 224-237.
4. Ma, X. and Xu, J. (2004) ‘The causal ordering of mathematics anxiety and mathematics achievement: a longitudinal panel analysis’, Journal of Adolescence, 27(2), pp. 165-179.
5. Hembree, R. (1990) ‘The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), pp. 33-46.
6. Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G. and Levine, S. C. (2010) ‘Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(5), pp. 1860-1863.
7. Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Levine, S. C. and Beilock, S. L. (2012) ‘The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes’, Sex Roles, 66(3-4), pp. 153-166.
8. Maloney, E. A., Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2015). Intergenerational effects of parents’ math anxiety on children’s math achievement and anxiety. Psychological Science, 26(9), 1480-1488.
9. Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2013). Math anxiety, working memory and math achievement in early elementary school. Journal of Cognition and Development,14(2), 187-202.
10. Wang, Z., Lukowski, S. L., Hart, S. A., Lyons, I.M.,Thompson, L.A., Petrill, S.A.,& Byrd-Craven, J. (2015). Is math anxiety always bad for math learning? The role of math motivation.Psychological Science, 26(12), 1863-1876.
11. Goetz, T., Bieg, M., Lüdtke, O., Pekrun, R., & Hall, N. C. (2013). Do girls really experience more anxiety in mathematics? Psychological Science, 24(10), 2079-2087.
12. Hopko, D. R., Mahadevan, R., Bare, R. L., & Hunt, M. K. (2003). The abbreviated math anxiety scale (AMAS): Construction, validity, and reliability. Assessment, 10(2), 178-182.
13. Ryan,K.,& Ryan, A.M. (2005). Psychological processes underlying stereotype threat and standardized math test performance. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 53-63.
14. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist,37(2), 91-105.
15. Zhang, J., Zhao, N., & Kong, Q. P. (2019). The relationship between math anxiety and math performance: A meta-analytic investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1613.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).