Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media

- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences


Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media

Vol. 49, 17 May 2024


Open Access | Article

The Difference of Chinese High School Students' Attitude Towards Chinese Traditional Learning Pattern and Project-based Learning

Youran He * 1
1 Beijing Haidian Kaiwen Academy

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, Vol. 49, 21-27
Published 17 May 2024. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by EWA Publishing
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation Youran He. The Difference of Chinese High School Students' Attitude Towards Chinese Traditional Learning Pattern and Project-based Learning. LNEP (2024) Vol. 49: 21-27. DOI: 10.54254/2753-7048/49/20231748.

Abstract

The exam-oriented Chinese education has a long history in China. After the introduction of Project-based learning, an educational method contrary to Chinese education, into China, many scholars and even parents began to compare the two methods and analyze their advantages and disadvantages. As the subject of education, students' opinions on educational methods are crucial. This study collected 31 participants who had experienced two educational methods, Chinese education, and project-based learning, and investigated their approval and affection of these two educational methods, as well as the effectiveness of their learning and their preference between the two methods through questionnaires. participants were asked what they thought were the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods of education using multiple choice questions. The survey results show that participants generally prefer project-based learning because of its relaxed classroom atmosphere. However, some of them think that in project-based learning, there are always team members who will delay the progress or quality of the project.

Keywords

Project-based learning, Chinese education, Student’s preference, Teaching methods, Exam-oriented education

References

1. Meng-ying, L. I. (2021). “Nei Juan” in Exam-oriented Education in China. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 11(12), 1028-1033.

2. Kirkpatrick, R., & Zang, Y. (2011). The negative influences of exam-oriented education on Chinese high school students: Backwash from classroom to child. Language testing in Asia, 1(3), 36.

3. Sit, H. H. W. (2013). Characteristics of Chinese students' learning styles. International proceedings of economics development and research, 62, 36.

4. Meng, H., Tang, M., & Wu, M. (2021, November). Current situation on exam-oriented education in China and the outlook for quality-oriented education. In 2021 3rd International Conference on Literature, Art and Human Development (ICLAHD 2021) (pp. 325-331). Atlantis Press

5. Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The clearing house, 83(2), 39-43.

6. Jumaat, N. F., Tasir, Z., Halim, N. D. A., & Ashari, Z. M. (2017). Project-based learning from constructivism point of view. Advanced Science Letters, 23(8), 7904-7906.

7. Gary, K. (2015). Project-based learning. Computer, 48(9), 98-100.

8. Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving schools, 19(3), 267-277.

9. Zhou, L., & Li, J. (2022). Developing core competence with Project-Based Learning: Voices from Chinese High School students serving visually impaired students. ECNU Review of Education, 5(2), 383-389.

10. Zhenyu, G. A. O. (2012). An arduous but hopeful journey: Implementing project-based learning in a middle school of China. Frontiers of Education in China, 7(4), 608-634.

11. Jia, J. G. (2023). A practical review on the application of project-based learning in primary and secondary schools. Teaching and Management, (22),25-28.

12. [12] Hyun, J., & Lee, D. (2017b). Students’ Satisfaction on Their Learning Process in Active Learning and Traditional Classrooms. International Journal of Teaching, 29(1), 108–118.

13. Turanlı, A. S. (2009). Students’ perceptions of teachers’ behaviors of social-emotional support and students’ satisfaction with the classroom atmosphere. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 35(1), 129-146.

14. Matsumura, L. C., Slater, S. C., & Crosson, A. (2008). Classroom climate, rigorous instruction and curriculum, and students' interactions in urban middle schools. The elementary school journal, 108(4), 293-312.

15. Sakineh, J., & Ali, A. (2020). Predicting students' academic achievement based on the classroom climate, mediating role of teacher-student interaction and academic motivation. Интеграция образования, 24(1 (98)), 62-74.

16. Tudge, J. (1989). When collaboration leads to regression: Some negative consequences of socio‐cognitive conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19(2), 123-138.

17. Sridharan, B., & Boud, D. (2019). The effects of peer judgements on teamwork and self-assessment ability in collaborative group work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 894-909.

18. Ying, X., Li, H., Jiang, S., Peng, F., & Lin, Z. (2014). Group laziness: The effect of social loafing on group performance. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 42(3), 465-471.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies
ISBN (Print)
978-1-83558-385-2
ISBN (Online)
978-1-83558-386-9
Published Date
17 May 2024
Series
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
ISSN (Print)
2753-7048
ISSN (Online)
2753-7056
DOI
10.54254/2753-7048/49/20231748
Copyright
17 May 2024
Open Access
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Copyright © 2023 EWA Publishing. Unless Otherwise Stated