Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Vol. 1, 26 December 2021
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This research uses conversation analysis to investigate an institutional discourse within a 28-day university level IELTS preparation class. The goals of this research are to explore: a) repair strategies taken by students and the teacher b) the pattern of turn-taking in an IELTS training class of speaking test. Findings show that the pattern of this result-oriented training class is IRF cycle, and that the most popular strategy applied by the teacher is recast.
turn-taking, IELTS speaking class, conversation analysis, repair strategies, EFL class
1. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, 50(4), 696. doi:10.2307/412243
2. Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361-382
3. Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2014). Conversation Analysis in Applied Linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 171-212. doi:10.1017/s0267190514000014
4. Rylander, J. (2014, September). INTERACTION IN A CHINESE AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE CLASSROOM ... Retrieved September 22, 2020, from https://www.hawaii.edu/sls/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Rylander.pdf
5. Wong, J., & Waring, H. Z. (2020). Interactional Practices and the Teaching of Conversation. In Conversation analysis and second language pedagogy: A guide for ESL/EFL teachers (pp. 2-13). New York, NY, US: Routledge.
6. Yan, C., & Yuan-yuan, C. (2012). A Study of EFL Classroom Discourse from the Perspectives of both DA and CA. Higher Education of Social Science, 3, 17-23.
7. Quaid, E. D. (2018). Reviewing the IELTS speaking test in East Asia: Theoretical and practice-based insights. Language Testing in Asia, 8(1). doi:10.1186/s40468-018-0056-5
8. Rabab’Ah, G. (2015). The Effect of Communication Strategy Training on the Development of EFL Learners’ Strategic Competence and Oral Communicative Ability. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45(3), 625-651. doi:10.1007/s10936-015-9365-3
9. Ellis, R. (1984). Communication strategies and the evaluation of communicative performance. ELT Journal, 38(1), 39–44. doi:10.1093/elt/38.1.39.
10. Shin, J. (2006, November 30). Developing Dynamic Units for EFL. Retrieved September 22, 2020, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1099323
11. Lerner, G. H. (2004). Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Pub.
12. Antaki, Charles & Biazzi, Michela & Nissen, Anette & Wagner, Johannes. (2008). Accounting for Moral Judgments in Academic Talk: The Case of a Conversation Analysis Data Session. Text & Talk - TEXT TALK. 28. 1-30. 10.1515/TEXT.2008.001.
13. Gardner, R. (2001). When listeners talk: Response tokens and listener stance. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
14. Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2006). Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69, 150–182.
15. Seo, M., & Koshik, I. (2010). A conversation analytic study of gestures that engender repair in ESL conversational tutoring. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2219-2239. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.021
16. Duran, D., & Jacknick, C. M. (2020). Teacher response pursuits in whole class post-task discussions. Linguistics and Education, 56, 100808. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2020.100808
17. Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum
18. Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as Feedback to Language Learners. Language Learning, 51(4), 719-758. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00172
19. Young, Davey. (2015). A Conversation Analysis of the Acquisition and Use of Turn-taking Practices in an English Discussion Class. 10.14992/00015992.
20. Nunan, D. (1987). Communicative language teaching: Making it work. ELT Journal, 41(2), 136-145. doi:10.1093/elt/41.2.136
21. Seedhouse, P. (1996). Classroom interaction: Possibilities and impossibilities. ELT Journal, 50(1), 16-24. doi:10.1093/elt/50.1.16
22. Ellis, R., & Sheen, Y. (2006). Reexamining The Role Of Recasts In Second Language Acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(04). doi:10.1017/s027226310606027x
23. Jaeger, E. L. (2019). Initiation, Response, Follow-up and Beyond: Analyzing Dialogue Around Difficulty in a Tutorial Setting. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 7. doi:10.5195/dpj.2019.195
24. Long, M. H. (1996). The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition. Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 413-468. doi:10.1016/b978-012589042-7/50015-3
25. Long, M. H. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ, US: L. Erlbaum Associates.
26. Stuckey, K. (2009). Language Expansion vs. Language Extension— What’s the Difference. Retrieved September 12, 2020, from https://www.superduperinc.com/handouts/pdf/227_LangExpExt.pdf
27. Gardner-Neblett, N., & Gallagher, K.C. (2013). More than baby talk: 10 ways to promote the language and communication skills for infants and toddlers. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute.
28. Talk, Read and Sing Together Every Day! Tips For Preschool Teachers & Other Early Childhood Education Program Providers. (n.d.). Retrieved September 17, 2020, from https://www2.ed.gov/documents/early-learning/talk-read-sing/preschool-en.pdf
29. Karimi, L., & Esfandiari, N. (2016). The Effect of Recast vs. Explicit Corrective Feedback on Iranian EFL Learners' Stress Patterns Learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 1166-1174, June 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0606.05
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).