Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media

- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences


Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media

Vol. 4, 17 May 2023


Open Access | Article

The Social Media Influence on Youth Spending

Beijia Lin * 1
1 Winchester Art School, University of Southampton, Southampton, so17 1bj, UK

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, Vol. 4, 92-100
Published 17 May 2023. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by EWA Publishing
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation Beijia Lin. The Social Media Influence on Youth Spending. LNEP (2023) Vol. 4: 92-100. DOI: 10.54254/2753-7048/4/20220165.

Abstract

In the 21st century, social media has become a tool for people to communicate and the most frequently used software. In China, the research focuses on whether social media has an impact on youth spending. This study used questionnaires and random interviews to determine whether social media has an impact on teenagers' spending. A total of 103 questionnaires were collected and 8 teenagers out of 103 teenagers (high school students) were selected as interviewees. The study found that teenagers were influenced by the spread of social media, had wrong ideas about money and led to an increase in spending. The study hopes that more attention will be paid to the development of money and spending concepts among teenagers

Keywords

youth spending, teenager, social media

References

1. Number of worldwide social network users 2027 | Statista. (2022). Retrieved 17 August 2022, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/

2. 45 times china internet network development state statistic report. (2020, April). China Internet Network Information Center; China Internet Network Information Center. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/m7jgPBLbczV4-UE1IkN2yw.

3. Kane, H. D., Taub, G. E., & Hayes, B. G. (2000). Interactive Media and Its Contribution to the Construction and Destruction of Values and Character. The Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and Development, 39(1), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2164-490x.2000.tb00094.x

4. Attanasio, O. P. (1999, January 1). Chapter 11 Consumption. ScienceDirect; Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574004899100193?casa_token=N7vw6az9fVgAAAAA:iyM6cPF7NZV7mqBOHU0WvfNsG7Od91iRQGNf8l0XBH_h15q7vvCQ_JohhG7OeigIMqp2zYHAcA

5. Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending Money on Others Promotes Happiness. Science, 319(5870), 1687–1688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150952

6. Wang, R. (2014). Consumerist culture - Baidu Wenku. Wenku.baidu.com. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/1bd254f5cd2f0066f5335a8102d276a2002960ac.html

7. Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018, May 31). Teens, Social Media & Technology 2018. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/

8. 2019 national juvenile internet usage research report. (2020, May). China Internet Network Information Center; China Internet network information center. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/aEopIkJ3EqnjM33WYL0jsQ.

9. MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies. Journal of Retailing, 88(4), 542–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2012.08.001

10. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! the Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.

11. Schønning, V., Hjetland, G., Aarø, L., & Skogen, J. (2020). Social Media Use and Mental Health and Well-Being Among Adolescents – A Scoping Review. Frontiers In Psychology, 11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01949

12. Beijing Internet Court: top-up reward cases account for 75% of online disputes involving minors. (2022). Retrieved 17 August 2022, from https://mo.mbd.baidu.com/r/L9RxhF6YNO?f=cp&u=f1f8596dc3316089

13. Swant, M. (2016). Twitter says users now trust influencers nearly as much as their friends. Retrieved from the Adweek website: http://www. adweek. com/digital/twitter-saysusers-now-trust-influencers-nearly-much-their-friends171367.

14. Hota, S. L. (2022). ANALYSIS OF INFLUENCER MARKETING IMPACT ON BUYING BEHAVIOUR AMONG TEENAGERS. International Journal, 7(1).

15. Kiesler, S., & Kraut, R. (1999). Internet use and ties that bind. American Psychologist, 54(9), 783–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.54.9.783

16. Whitty, M. T. (2002). Liar, liar! An examination of how open, supportive and honest people are in chat rooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(4), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0747-5632(01)00059-0

17. Charles Horton Cooley. (1993). The roots of social knowledge. Bobbs-Merreill.

18. 84.1% of parents of children surveyed feel that they are surrounded by parents who like to use electronic devices to coax their children. (2022). Retrieved 17 August 2022, from https://m.gmw.cn/baijia/2022-06/09/1302987798.html

19. Tandoc, E. C., Ferrucci, P., & Duffy, M. (2015). Facebook use, envy, and depression among college students: Is facebooking depressing? Computers in Human Behavior, 43(43), 139–146.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.053

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).

Volume Title
Proceedings of the International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies (ICIHCS 2022), Part 3
ISBN (Print)
978-1-915371-33-1
ISBN (Online)
978-1-915371-34-8
Published Date
17 May 2023
Series
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
ISSN (Print)
2753-7048
ISSN (Online)
2753-7056
DOI
10.54254/2753-7048/4/20220165
Copyright
17 May 2023
Open Access
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Copyright © 2023 EWA Publishing. Unless Otherwise Stated