Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Vol. 27, 07 December 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
The impact of Tax-Sharing Reform on the housing market in China and its effectiveness in curbing speculative practices are subjects of critical importance. The Chinese government’s principle of “Housing is for living, not for speculation” underscores the challenges posed by the persistent housing bubble, fueled by speculative behavior. This study delves into the historical context of the 1994 tax-sharing reform, which initially stimulated the growth of the housing market by increasing government revenue and providing local governments with greater financial autonomy. Drawing on a comprehensive analysis, this paper explores the underlying causes of the current issues in the housing market and evaluates the effectiveness of the tax-sharing reform in regulating speculative practices. While the reform exhibited positive outcomes in the past, this study argues that its applicability in the present scenario warrants scrutiny. The evolving market dynamics and contextual factors necessitate a reevaluation of the policy’s effectiveness. Taking a balanced approach, the paper critically examines the benefits and drawbacks of the tax-sharing reform in the context of the current housing market challenges. Additionally, the study presents the author’s perspective on the reform’s limitations and proposes alternative policy suggestions to address the persisting issues more effectively. By offering insights into the reform’s impact on the housing market’s development trajectory, this research aims to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between fiscal policies and the Chinese housing market. The paper uses qualitative method and case study to illustrate the topic.
housing bubble, tax-sharing reform, fiscal policy, land finance
1. Li, K. (2023). Report on The Work of The Government. Xinhua News Agency.
2. Chen, A. (1996). China’s urban housing reform: price-rent ratio and market equilibrium. Urban Studies, 33(7), 1077-1092.
3. Kim, Kijun & Yao, Yao & Song, Seonju. (2017). The Influence of School District. Characteristics on Housing Prices -Evidence from Beijing, China-. Konkuk Research Institute of Real Estate and Urban Studies. 9. 151-168. 10.22423/KREUS.2017.9.2.151.
4. Fang, H., et al. (2015). Demystifying the Chinese Housing Boom. NBER Macroeconomics. Annual, 30(1).
5. Gong, R. K. (2012). Tax-Sharing Reform, Land Finance, and Housing Price Levels. World Economic Papers.
6. Chen, Z. Y. & Chen, L. L. (2009). Exploration of Fiscal System and Local Government Financial Behavior: A Perspective on Governing “Land Finance.” Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 2, 42-46.
7. Sun, X. L. & Zhou, F. Z. (2013). Land Finance and the Tax-Sharing System: An Empirical Explanation. Social Sciences in China.
8. Li, H., et al. (2013). The Mystery of Land Finance Growth in China: Tax-sharing Reform, Strategic Interaction of Land Finance. China Economic Quarterly, 12 (4).
9. Zhou, F. Z. (2006). A Decade of Tax-Sharing: the System and its Evolution. China Academic Journal.
10. Zhang, Y. & Gong, L. T. (2005). The Fenshuizhi Reform, Fiscal Decentralization, and Economic Growth in China. China Economic Quarterly, 5 (1).
11. Ahuja, M. A., Cheung, L., Han, G., Porter, M. N., & Zhang, W. (2010). Are house prices rising too fast in China? International Monetary Fund.
12. Chung, S. (2016). Abandoned architectural marvels in China’s largest ghost town. CNN.
13. Deng, Y., Morck, R., Wu, J., & Yeung, B. (2011). Monetary and fiscal stimuli, ownership. structure, and China’s housing market (No. w16871). National Bureau of Economic Research.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).